Language：Japanese  

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Wiley  

Aims: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) immunohistochemistry has shifted from being a screening tool to being a sole determinant for ALK-targeted therapy. Recent articles have referred to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation as a resistance mechanism after ALK inhibitor treatments, but few reports have addressed ALK expression in treatment-naive SCLC in a comprehensive manner. Therefore, we examined ALK expression and the mechanisms in treatment-naive SCLCs. Methods and results: We examined ALK expression in a consecutive series of SCLC tumours, and the expression mechanism was analysed regarding gene rearrangement, copy number changes, and point mutations. We also examined whether SCLC with ALK expression can be suppressed by crizotinib treatment in vitro. Immunohistochemical results revealed that ALK was expressed in 16 of 142 (11.3%) SCLCs. The expression was focal and less intense, which is in contrast to strong and uniform expression in adenocarcinoma with ALK rearrangement. Two combined SCLCs showed a positive reaction restricted to the SCLC component. None of the known genetic alterations, including rearrangement, amplification, copy number gain, or point mutations, were associated with ALK expression. A SCLC cell line, SKLC2, which expressed ALK without known genetic alterations, was not inhibited by a practically achievable serum concentration of crizotinib. Conclusions: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemistry for treatment-naive SCLCs should not be used as a predictive biomarker for ALK inhibitor therapy, because the positive reactions were due to intrinsic expression of normal ALK transcript.

DOI： 10.1111/his.13842

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

CiNii Research

Language：English  

DOI： 10.1007/s00270-017-1845-4

PubMed

Language：English  

DOI： 10.18632/oncotarget.21602

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Clinical Cancer Research  

Purpose: Lung cancers harboring common EGFR mutations respond to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), whereas exon 20 insertions (Ins20) are resistant to them. However, little is known about mutations in exon 18. Experimental Design: Mutational status of lung cancers between 2001 and 2015 was reviewed. Three representative mutations in exon 18, G719A, E709K, and exon 18 deletion (Del18: delE709-T710insD) were retrovirally introduced into Ba/F3 and NIH/3T3 cells. The 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90s) of first-generation (1G; gefitinib and erlotinib), secondgeneration (2G; afatinib, dacomitinib, and neratinib), and third-generation TKIs (3G; AZD9291 and CO1686) were determined. Results: Among 1,402 EGFR mutations, Del19, L858R, and Ins20 were detected in 40%, 47%, and 4%, respectively. Exon 18 mutations, including G719X, E709X, and Del18, were present in 3.2%. Transfected Ba/F3 cells grew in the absence of IL3, and NIH/3T3 cells formed foci with marked pile-up, indicating their oncogenic abilities. IC90s of 1G and 3G TKIs in G719A, E709K, and Del18 were much higher than those in Del19 (by >1150- fold), whereas IC90s of afatinib were only 3- to 7-fold greater than those for Del19. Notably, cells transfected with G719A and E709K exhibited higher sensitivity to neratinib (by 525-fold) than those expressing Del19. Patients with lung cancers harboring G719X exhibited higher response rate to afatinib or neratinib (80%) than to 1G TKIs (35%56%) by compilation of data in the literature. Conclusions: Lung cancers harboring exon 18 mutations should not be overlooked in clinical practice. These cases can be best treated with afatinib or neratinib, although the currently available in vitro diagnostic kits cannot detect all exon 18 mutations.

DOI： 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1046

Scopus

PubMed

Language：Japanese  

DOI： 10.2169/naika.103.1281

PubMed

Language：English  

DOI： 10.1002/cam4.172

PubMed