Language：English   Publisher：Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology  

Introduction: Diagnosis of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA) localization by an electrocardiographic complex is key to successful catheter ablation for OTVA. However, diagnosing the origin of OTVA with a precordial transition in lead V3 (V3TZ) is challenging. This study aimed to create the best practical electrocardiogram algorithm to differentiate the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) of OTVA origin with V3TZ using machine learning. Methods: Of 498 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for OTVA, we included 104 patients who underwent ablation for OTVA with V3TZ and identified the origin of LVOT (n = 62) and RVOT (n = 42) from the results. We analyzed the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram preoperatively and measured 128 elements in each case. The study population was randomly divided into training group (70%) and testing group (30%), and decision tree analysis was performed using the measured elements as features. The performance of the algorithm created in the training group was verified in the testing group. Results: Four measurements were identified as important features: the aVF/II R-wave ratio, the V2S/V3R index, the QRS amplitude in lead V3, and the R-wave deflection slope in lead V3. Among them, the aVF/II R-wave ratio and the V2S/V3R index had a particularly strong influence on the algorithm. The performance of this algorithm was extremely high, with an accuracy of 94.4%, precision of 91.5%, recall of 100%, and an F1-score of 0.96. Conclusions: The novel algorithm created using machine learning is useful in diagnosing the origin of OTVA with V3TZ.

DOI： 10.1111/jce.15823

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology  

Background: The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm automatically produces synchronized left ventricular pacing (sLVP) with intrinsic atrioventricular conduction to improve clinical outcomes. However, relationship between sLVP percentage and risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of sLVP rate on VT/VF occurrence. Methods: In total, 1,419 device interrogation data from 42 consecutive patients who underwent new aCRT device implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the first time VT/VF episode after aCRT device implantation. Results: During a median follow-up of 34 months, 15 patients had VT/VF episodes. Patients were divided into a high sLVP (the average sLVP percentage of ≥ 51.5%, n = 27) or low sLVP group (< 51.5%, n = 15). The high sLVP group had a significantly lower VT/VF incidence (22% vs. 60%; p = 0.014) and an independent predictor for VT/VF occurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.21; p = 0.007). LV ejection fraction improvements after 6 months (12.3 ± 8.7% vs. 2.8 ± 10.3%; p = 0.004) and 12 months (13.8 ± 9.3% vs. 6.2 ± 11.1%; p = 0.030) were significantly greater in the high sLVP group than in the low sLVP group. Age, PR interval, and left atrial diameter were significantly associated with the sLVP rate after aCRT. Conclusions: Patients with high sLVP percentage after aCRT had lower long-term risk of VT/VF incidence with a favorable response to CRT. A synchronized pacing algorithm using intrinsic conduction may prevent malignant arrhythmias, as well as recover cardiac functions.

DOI： 10.1007/s10840-022-01284-z

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology  

Background: The current study aimed to evaluate changes in electrical depolarization and repolarization parameters after His-bundle pacing (HBP) compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP) and its association with ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Methods: Forty-one patients (13 with HBP, 14 with RVP, and 14 controls [AAI mode]) were evaluated. After continuous pacing algorithm, QRS duration, QT interval, QTc, JT interval, T-peak to T-end (Tpe), and Tpe/QT ratio were measured on electrocardiography at baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. We investigated VA occurrence and adverse events after implantation. Results: At 6 months, QRS duration was significantly shorter in the HBP (121.6 ± 15.6 ms) than in the RVP (150.1 ± 14.9 ms) group. The QT intervals were lower in the HBP (424.0 ± 40.9 ms) and control (405.9 ± 23.0 ms) groups than in the RVP (453.0 ± 40.2 ms) group. The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios at 6 months differed significantly between the HBP and RVP groups (Tpe, 69.8 ± 19.7 ms vs 87.4 ± 11.9 ms and Tpe/QT, 0.16 ± 0.03 vs 0.19 ± 0.02, respectively). The Tpe and Tpe/QT ratios were similarly shortened in the HBP and control groups. VA occurred less frequently in the HBP (15%) and control (7.1%) groups than in the RVP (50%) group (p = 0.020). The non-RVP group showed significantly lower rates of VA and major adverse events than the RVP group. Patients with VA demonstrated significantly longer QRS duration, QT interval, Tpe, and Tpe/QT at 6 months than those without VA. Conclusion: HBP showed better depolarization and repolarization stability than RVP.

DOI： 10.1111/anec.12991

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology  

Introduction: Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing (rATP) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) suppresses the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF) to the persistent form. However, the clinical factors associated with successful reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing (rATP) treatment are unknown. This study aimed to examine the predictors of high rATP efficacy in patients with CIEDs. Methods: The data of 101,325 rATP-treated atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT/AF) episodes in 51 patients, obtained through remote monitoring and device interrogation, were analyzed. The study population was divided into the high and low efficacy groups based on the overall median success rate of rATP. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups. Results: During a follow-up period of 28.6 ± 8.6 months, the median success rate was 43.7% (31.5%–64.9%). The prevalence of a history of catheter ablation of AF was significantly higher in the high efficacy group than in the low efficacy group (73.0% vs. 44.0%, p =.048) and was the only independent predictor of high rATP efficacy (odds ratio, 3.45; p =.038). The rATP success rate in patients with (n = 30) and without (n = 21) a history of catheter ablation was 53.9% (40.0%–67.5%) and 36.4% (22.2%–47.7%), respectively (p =.012). The effect of rATP after ablation was more pronounced in patients with long cycle length episodes (≥75% of AT/AF sequences having a cycle length of 200–449 ms) (67.3% [46.0%–73.6%] vs. 30.6% [18.1%–60.3%], p =.027). The high efficacy group had a significantly lower incidence of AT/AF lasting ≥1, ≥7, and ≥30 days than the low efficacy group. Conclusion: rATP combined with catheter ablation therapy is effective in suppressing AT/AF.

DOI： 10.1111/jce.15551

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

Language：Japanese   Publisher：JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology  

Background: Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is associated with perioperative thromboembolic risk. However, the strategy for postprocedural management remains unknown. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prothrombotic response after VT ablation in various coagulation biomarkers in patients with and without the administration of oral anticoagulation (OAC). Methods: Data from 112 patients (58 with uninterrupted OAC and 54 without) with structural heart disease who underwent endocardial VT ablation were retrospectively analyzed. We also included 41 patients who underwent ablation for premature ventricular contraction from the right ventricle and 13 patients who underwent electrophysiology study (the control group). Blood samples of coagulation markers were collected before and 3 days after the procedure in all patients. Results: The percentage of D-dimer levels ≤1.0 μg/mL at baseline was lower in the VT ablation groups (76% and 50% in the OAC and non-OAC groups, respectively) than in the other groups (100%). After 3 days, the percentage remained at 67% in the OAC group; however, the non-OAC VT group demonstrated a remarkable decrease of 20%. Similarly, fibrin monomer complex, thrombin antithrombin, and prothrombin fragment 1+2 levels were well suppressed in the control, premature ventricular contraction, and OAC groups. However, the non-OAC group demonstrated increased coagulation markers both before and after 3 days. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that OAC administration and normal coagulation markers at baseline were independent predictors of stable coagulation status after ablation. Conclusions: The coagulation cascade was significantly activated in patients undergoing VT ablation. Uninterrupted OAC administration suppressed the coagulation response, which might be associated with a reduction in perioperative prothrombotic risk.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.02.015

Scopus

PubMed