記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：Anticancer Research  

Background/Aim: In patients with esophageal cancer, muscle loss induced by neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy is correlated with poor prognosis. However, little is known about the causes of muscle loss. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective study was to clarify the risk factors for muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with esophageal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy before esophagectomy between 2009 and 2020 were investigated (n=132). The patients received either cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF); docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF); or CF with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy. The cross-sectional areas of the bilateral psoas muscles were measured at the level of the third lumbar vertebra using CT, before and after neoadjuvant therapy, and psoas muscle loss was calculated. The patients were divided into the high muscle loss group with 5% or more muscle loss or the low muscle loss group with less than 5% loss. Correlations between muscle loss and clinical factors were evaluated. Results: The median value of psoas muscle loss was 5.30%. Psoas muscle loss was significantly correlated with a poor 3-year overall survival rate (p=0.034). Multivariate analysis showed that the independent factors associated with muscle loss were age ≥70 years [odds ratio (OR)=2.43, p=0.022], treatment with DCF (OR=3.47, p=0.034), and a poor response to neoadjuvant therapy (OR=2.68, p=0.028). Conclusion: A regimen of DCF was a major trigger of muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy.

DOI： 10.21873/anticanres.16278

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

出版者・発行元：株式会社医学書院  

DOI： 10.11477/mf.1407213704

CiNii Research

記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：Scientific Reports  

Gastric stump cancer (GSC) has distinct clinicopathological characteristics from primary gastric cancer. However, the detailed molecular and pathological characteristics of GSC remain to be clarified because of its rarity. In this study, a set of tissue microarrays from 89 GSC patients was analysed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in 98.9% of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and 6.7% of tumour cells (TCs). Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) was detected in 18 patients (20.2%). Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and deficiency of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were observed in 5.6% and 1.1% of cases, respectively. Moreover, we used next-generation sequencing to determine the gene mutation profiles of a subset of the 50 most recent patients. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (42.0%) followed by SMAD4 (18.0%) and PTEN (16.0%), all of which are tumour suppressor genes. A high frequency of PD-L1 expression in TIICs and a high EBV infection rate suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of GSC despite a relatively low frequency of deficient MMR gene expression. Other molecular characteristics such as PTEN and SMAD4 mutations might be considered to develop new treatment strategies.

DOI： 10.1038/s41598-021-83711-1

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：Surgical Endoscopy  

Background: Insufficient information is available about the long-term outcomes of patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) who undergo laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTH). Here we evaluated the oncological safety of LTH for patients with Siewert type II AEG compared with the open transhiatal approach (OTH). Methods: Subjects included 79 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent gastrectomy combined with lower esophagectomy from 2008 to 2018 at our institution. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), status of adjuvant chemotherapy, late-phase complications, and recurrence patterns were compared between the OTH (n = 29) and LTH groups (n = 43). Results: The median observation periods were 60 months (6–120 months) and 36 months (1–88) for the OTH and LTH groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were significantly different: 74% (95% CI 71–77%) and 98% (95% CI 97–99) in the OTH and LTH groups (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01–0.83), respectively, though the OTH group included more patients with advanced disease. After stratification, according to pathological stage to adjust for selection bias, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were longer, but not significantly different among patients in the LTH group with pStage III (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.05–3.47; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.10–2.12, respectively). Recurrence patterns were similar in the both groups. Conclusions: Long-term outcomes of the LTH group were not inferior to those of the OTH group, suggesting the possibility of LTH as a treatment option for selected patients with Siewert type II AEG.

DOI： 10.1007/s00464-020-07406-w

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：Journal of Surgical Oncology  

Background and Objectives: The lymphatic flow around the esophagogastric junction is complicated. Therefore, it is unclear whether lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region (eLI) and in the gastric region (gLI) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) equally affect the incidence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and consequently, survival. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of 175 patients with AEG between January 2008 and July 2017. Risk factors for LNM and impacts of eLI or gLI on survival outcomes were investigated. Results: eLI was identified in 34% of the patients (59/175). By multivariate analysis, eLI was associated with an increased risk of both mediastinal LNM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-7.05) and abdominal LNM (OR = 5.44, 95% CI: 1.95-15.20). The 5-year overall survival for patients with eLI (53%) was significantly worse than for patients without eLI (76%) (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.37-10.01). gLI was not selected in either of these analyses. Conclusions: Positive eLI was strongly associated with mediastinal and abdominal LNM and worse survival in patients with AEG compared with gLI. In the histopathological examination, it seems to make sense to assess eLI and gLI separately.

DOI： 10.1002/jso.25964

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

CiNii Research

記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：Surgery Today  

Purpose: Lymphatic invasion (LI) is associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and a poor prognosis in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Although the impact of the LI volume on LNM has been described, no reports have assessed the impact of its depth on LNM. Methods: A total of 360 EGC patients with pathologically proven LI who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and June 2018 at our institution were extracted from our database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the mLI group, in which LI was limited to the muscularis mucosae (n = 34); and the smLI group, in which LI reached the submucosal region (n = 326). Clinicopathological features, including the LNM incidence, were compared between the groups. Results: LNM was recognized in 3 patients (9%) in the mLI group and 101 (31%) in the smLI group (P = 0.005). In the mLI group, LNM was not recorded in any patients who met the curative criteria of ESD other than mLI. Conclusions: LI limited to the mucosal region does not seem to be a strong indicator for LNM. When pathological findings of an endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen show only mLI as a non-curative criterion, the probability of LNM may be very low.

DOI： 10.1007/s00595-019-01913-7

Web of Science

Scopus

PubMed

開催年月日： 2022年12月

記述言語：日本語   会議種別：口頭発表（一般）  

開催地：名古屋   国名：日本国  

開催年月日： 2022年7月

記述言語：英語   会議種別：シンポジウム・ワークショップ パネル（公募）  

開催地：横浜   国名：日本国