Faculty Profiles - KUKITA Minao

Papers - KUKITA Minao

Division display 21 - 40 of about 54 ／ All the affair displays >>

人工知能と人間のよりよい共生のために

久木田水生

『RAD-IT21 WEBマガジン』 page： 0 2020.3

ロボット兵器の倫理的問題：殺人の自動化というテクノロジー Invited

久木田水生

世界 Vol. 925 page： 123-130 2019.10

人工知能は知識を持てるか Invited

久木田水生

こころの未来 Vol. 21 page： 22-25 2019.8

人工知能はメッセージである Invited

久木田水生

大学出版 Vol. 119 page： 14-17 2019.7

Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities Reviewed

Arisa EMA , Hirotaka OSAWA, Reina SAIJO, Akinori KUBO, Takushi OTANI, Hiromitsu HATTORI, Naonori AKIYA, Nobutsugu KANZAKI, Minao KUKITA, Kazunori KOMATANI, Ryuichiro ICHISE

Proceedings of the IEEE Vol. 107 ( 3 ) page： 575-581 2019.3

人を評価する人工知能が人間同士の関係に与える影響とその倫理的含意 Invited

久木田水生

三田評論 Vol. 1230 page： 00 2019.2

遠隔戦争の論理と倫理 Invited

久木田水生

αシノドス Vol. 257+258 page： 00 2018.12

人工知能の倫理的課題 Invited

久木田水生

あいみっく Vol. 39 ( 3 ) page： 50-53 2018.9

二一世紀の可愛い機械のトルコ人たち Invited

久木田水生

ユリイカ：詩と批評 Vol. 50 ( 9 ) page： 207-214 2018.6

ICTがもたらすコミュニケーションの変容 Invited Reviewed

久木田水生

中部哲学会年報 Vol. 49 page： 27-40 2018.4

Clarifying Privacy, Property, and Power: Case Study on Value Conflict Between Communities Invited Reviewed

Arisa EMA , Hirotaka OSAWA, Reina SAIJO, Akinori KUBO, Takushi OTANI, Hiromitsu HATTORI, Naonori AKIYA, Nobutsugu KANZAKI, Minao KUKITA, Kazunori KOMATANI, Ryuichiro ICHISE

Proceedings of the IEEE page： 00 2018

Wheat and Pepper: Interactions between Technologies and Humans Invited

Minao Kukita

Vol. 32 ( 5 ) page： 653-659 2017.9

Breaking Down Silos: Involving Various Researchers for Driving HCI Research Reviewed

Arisa Ema, Hirotaka Osawa, Hiromitsu Hattori, Naonori Akiya, Nobutsugu Kanzaki, Ryutaro Ichise, Minao Kukita, Takushi Otani, Akinori Kubo, Kazunori Komatani, Reina Saijo, Mikihito Tanaka, , Koziro Honda, Naoki Miyano, Yoshimi Yashiro, Go Yoshizawa

page： 837-847 2017

Future Relations between Humans and Artificial Intelligence: A Stakeholder Opinion Survey in Japan Reviewed

Arisa EMA, Naonori AKIYA, Hirotaka OSAWA, Hiromitsu HATTORI, Shinya OIE, Ryutaro ICHISE, Nobutsugu KANZAKI, Minao KUKITA, Reina SAIJO, Otani TAKUSHI, Naoki MIYANO, and Yoshimi YASHIRO

IEEE Technology and Society Magazine Vol. 35 ( 4 ) page： 68-75 2016.12

Beyond the Logic of the Arms Race Invited

Minao Kukita

Vol. 31 ( 5 ) page： 616-617 2016.9

Morality in the Machine Invited

Minao Kukita

Vol. 57 ( 10 ) page： 962-963 2016.9

運転・育児・防災活動，どこまで機械に任せるか：多様なステークホルダーへのアンケート調査 Reviewed

江間有沙，秋谷直矩，大澤博隆，服部宏充，大家慎也，市瀬龍太郎，神崎宣次，久木田水生，西條玲奈，大谷卓史，宮野公樹，八代嘉美

情報管理 Vol. 59 ( 5 ) page： 322-330 2016.8

Differences between artificial intelligence and artificial morality Reviewed

Minao Kukita

pplied Ethics: Security, Sustainability and Human Flourishing page： 27-37 2015

Authorship：Lead author Language：English Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)

Today, an increasing number and variety of autonomous robots and software applications are working in many areas of our daily life. The fear is that their complicated interactions with one another and with humans might lead to unpredictable disasters. Thus, some researchers insist that we should enable artificial systems to autonomously make a `good' decision, i.e., a decision that respects society's values. Thus emerged a new academic field known as `artificial morality,' `
artificial ethics', or `machine ethics', a discipline that attempts to implement human moral judgement and moral action into artificial systems. According to some researchers in this field, it is sufficient to make an artificial agent only apparently moral, without regard for whether they are fully moral in the same sense as human beings. Just as weak artificial intelligence (AI) can be sufficient for certain practical purposes, limited `functional morality' will be just as effective for certain practical purposes. Additionally, most projects concerning artificial morality are in line with mainstream artificial intelligence. In this paper, we critically consider whether this analogy between artificial intelligence and artificial morality holds true. We point out that one of the critical differences is that, while deploying artificial intelligence for certain practical purposes raises no question in general, to deploy artificial morality can be morally questionable in some situations.

Can robots understand values?: Artificial morality and ethical symbol grounding Reviewed

Minao Kukita

Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Applied Ethics and Applied Philosophy in East Asia page： 65-76 2014.2

人工知能、ロボット、知性

久木田水生

社会と倫理 Vol. 28 page： 51-65 2013.11

　 PREV - NEXT 　

<KUKITA Minao>

Papers - KUKITA Minao